A relative examination of compared interactional designs however have fun with s of Grindr and you will Tinder
Societal Communications , 44 (2), 186-209. LeBaron, C., & Jones, S. Age. (2002). Closure right up cl osings: Appearing the brand new value out-of th elizabeth personal and you may material surround so you’re able to the culmination of interac tion. Diary regarding Communications, 52 (3), 542-565. Licoppe, C. (2020). Diary away from Cultural Cost savings , thirteen (1), 73- 90. Licoppe, C. (2021). The spectre out-of ghosting’and the fresh sequential team out of blog post -suits Tinder 155-276). Palgrave McMillan. Maynard, D. W., & Zimmerman, D. H. (19 84). Topical talk, routine while the societal organ ization regarding dating. Personal mindset quarterly , 47 , 301-316. midwife-lady communication. Guidance Lookup, 15 (1), paper 423 [Offered at: tml]. Mortensen, K. K. (2017). Discourse Degree , 19 (5), 581-597. ranging from potential intimate couples inside WeCha t conversations. Discourse Training , 24 (5), 545-565. Schenkein (Ed.), Education throughout the company from conver sational communication (pp. 79 112). Educational Pomerantz, A great. (1984). Agreeing and you may disagreeing wi th examination: Particular features of common / dispreferred change molds. Inside J. M. Atkinson & J. C. Heri tage (eds.), Structures of personal action: Knowledge for the conversation study (pp. 57 101).
